Ok, I watched the new Bones ep this week (6x17, The Feet On The Beach) and something really bugged me about it.
We discover during the episode that a homeless man has taken the possession of the victims shoes. When we see them, they appear to be whole and intact.
Our victim, Dylan McEllroy, was killed sejak the blades of a ride-on tractor. The details of this including one of his feet being dismembered somewhere between ankle and knee, the other foot sustaining significant damage due to the markers in the surviving bone. While it is possible (but unlikely) for the shoe belonging to the foot which was dismembered to survive intact and free from blood, I am somewhat stumped in regards to the other shoe.
Angela's reconstruction of the crime clearly shows the traktor blades slicing through the victims foot. Our homeless man clearly states he REMOVED the shoes from the deceased victim. Yet, berkata shoes are completely intact and free from blood.
Maybe I missed something here, if so please feel free to correct me, cos I found this rather bothering.
We discover during the episode that a homeless man has taken the possession of the victims shoes. When we see them, they appear to be whole and intact.
Our victim, Dylan McEllroy, was killed sejak the blades of a ride-on tractor. The details of this including one of his feet being dismembered somewhere between ankle and knee, the other foot sustaining significant damage due to the markers in the surviving bone. While it is possible (but unlikely) for the shoe belonging to the foot which was dismembered to survive intact and free from blood, I am somewhat stumped in regards to the other shoe.
Angela's reconstruction of the crime clearly shows the traktor blades slicing through the victims foot. Our homeless man clearly states he REMOVED the shoes from the deceased victim. Yet, berkata shoes are completely intact and free from blood.
Maybe I missed something here, if so please feel free to correct me, cos I found this rather bothering.
