Do anda think Buffy and Angel Should of had a child togethor later, instead Of Darla? tinjauan Results - Buffy The Vampire Slayer

What do you think? Place your vote!

(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)

Buffy The Vampire Slayer Do anda think Buffy and Angel Should of had a child togethor later, instead Of Darla?

308 fans picked:

53%

Yes

47%

BuffySummers17 posted hampir setahun yang lalu

Make your pick! | next poll >>

27 comments

	sexylilchelc picked Yes: What half vampire half slayer? How ironic lol posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	PiperChris picked Yes: yes-i-love-them-together-plus-i-hate-darla posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	amazondebs picked No: that wouldn't make sense n Buffy couldn't deal posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	miss_anna picked No: NOOOO!!! I hate Angel with Buffy, she shouldn't be with him. When the had sex he became evil, so she would be pregnant with Angels child and he would become Angelus, no no. She should be with Spike. Go Spuffy!!! posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	BuffySummers17 picked Yes: Miss_Anna The reason Angel turned into Angelus any time he and Buffy Had Sex was because he had a moment of true happiness. Like Wesley said in the episode Smile time: Do you know how rare it is to have the moment of happiness, some of the greastest relationship have had only acceptable Happiness. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	nosemuffin picked No: I think that would be bad, really really bad. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	christineadkins picked Yes: i agree with buffysummers17 posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	TwilightFreak08 picked No: It Wouldve Made Everything Too Complicated posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	SSchwartz picked Yes: he would have made for a much better psychological twist. one half of him is made to kill the other. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	BuffyFan100 picked No: Ummm yeah ummmmm that would have definatly changed things lol Half Vampire Half Slayer Buffy was only 17 anyways bad idea I mean you cant go kill demons and change diapers posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	NikaDawson picked No: Buffy wouldn't be a good mother. She could barely take care of Dawn. Plus, I don't like Bangel. But I'm not saying this just because I'm a Spuffy, but just because it would be completely wrong for both characters. When they were together Buffy was to young to have a child, and when they weren't Buffy was dealing with depression and her mother's death, and they were two cites apart. It wouldn't have worked. Darla and Angel having a child together, the one good thing they ever did together, that was a beautiful moment and the right thing to happen for them and I wouldn't want that changed. posted hampir setahun yang lalu. last edited hampir setahun yang lalu

	CharmedFan4eva_ picked Yes: what do u mean buffy wouldnt be a good mother? darla wasnt good eaither posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	amazondebs picked No: darla didn't even have chance to be a mother, in fact for what she was there for she was a brilliant mother, she made the ultimate sacrifice to save her child posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	rose2 picked Yes: yes!!!!!!!!! posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	nataliejade picked No: The storyline wouldn't of been as good i don't think. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	Rainbeau picked No: "Darla and Angel having a child together, the one good thing they ever did together, that was a beautiful moment and the right thing to happen for them and I wouldn't want that changed" I totally agree with this... This is a real reason, imo "I hate Darla" is a crap-reason... It isn't about if you like her or not, it is about the storyline... Duh... posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	Bangel1998 picked Yes: They would be perfect parents... Plus I hate Spuffy to death... :) posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	friendsfan101 picked No: I love Bangel but "When they were together Buffy was to young to have a child, and when they weren't Buffy was dealing with depression and her mother's death, and they were two cites apart. It wouldn't have worked. Darla and Angel having a child together, the one good thing they ever did together, that was a beautiful moment and the right thing to happen for them and I wouldn't want that changed." totally agree. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	meow_girl said: I REALLY hate Darla. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	Hostile_17 picked No: Oh god no. I don't like that Angel had a child at all even though i did like conner he just shouldn't have. And I would have killed some one if buffy had a baby with him posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	snowwhitesilver picked Yes: I just always wanted them to have more than they did. That's why I've started on the graphic novels. Still holding out hope for something more for them. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	frankthe2nd picked No: No. Absolutely NOT. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	Fan18 picked Yes: yes yes and um.....YES!!!!!!! posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	goodbyemra picked No: No, terrible idea. Buffy certainly didn't need to be tied down to a kid, she had to deal with a lot more bigger problems. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	Nobizen picked No: Then they wouldn't have had the ep with non evil Darla in Angel! Also Connor would be different posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	QueenCordelia picked No: God no, I hate Bangel. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.

	LowriLorenza89 picked No: Even though I love Bangel, and I'd like the idea of them having children in future after Angel turns human (Shanshu prophecy), I like the fact that it was Darla who bore his miracle child. That way Connor's existence doesn't get drawn into a shipping war the way he would if his mother had been Buffy or Cordy. And as other comments point out, Buffy couldn't cope with a pregnancy or a child, especially if Angel had lost his soul again when the baby was conceived. posted hampir setahun yang lalu.