Consensual Necrophilia?

I support any decision anyone makes when it comes to their post-mortem desires, but I do believe that a line should be drawn only in the case their their request in harmful to other people.

I never looked much into the safety risks of necrophilia, so I don't know how selamat, peti deposit keselamatan atau dangerous it is. If it's not very risky, I'm fine with it.
I don't think it would be "promoting" anything, unless it somehow becomes a recommended practice.

Something being allowed doesn't always mean it's being promoted.


EDIT:
I finally decided to do some research.
Dr. Kenneth Iserson wrote a book about dead bodies and decomposition called "Death to Dust" and his finding are that dead bodies are generally harmless to our health. The bacterium involved in decomposition are already present in our bodies. As long as we are living, we're immune to their effects.
Even if the body were to have maggots and other insects aren't harmful to your health.

The only way a dead body would be able to infect another person would be if the body was infected sejak an infectious virus. A body won't simply become infectious because it's dead.




My only standard on the issue would be that the sexual act be done before the body goes into the softening stage, so the body doesn't tear apart. This stage doesn't occur until 3 weeks after death.

While I agree with allowing after-death requests, I think that necrophilia is going too far. It is simply, 'disgusting' and it simply degrades us as human beings.

I have to make several points:

1. If the person, who died, made that decision, what state were they in mentally?

2. What about the wishes of their family. For example, if my mother died and requested, before her death, that my father had sex with her one last time with her corpse, I would be honestly disgusted. It is important to remember the feelings of the deceased's family too. Just because they make an unreasonable request, does not mean that it 'has' to be granted. How would anda feel if the same happened to a relative of yours?

I honestly think there should be 'moral' restrictions to granting a 'post-mortem' request.

If it's consensual, I don't see what the issue is.

I know that one of the komen-komen was "what if the family isn't comfortable with it?" anda could say that about anything regarding family and rights. What if a person berkata that if they were ever on life support, they would want to be taken off, and the family isn't comfortable with that? Do they have the right to keep the person on life-support, and go against the other's wishes? What if a person berkata they wanted to be buried, not cremated, and the family isn't comfortable with that? Should the person be cremated, even though it was against their wishes? atau vice-versa. What if the idea of a mother's daughter's body being burned is exceptionally uncomfortable for her? Does she have the right to go "well, she wanted to be cremated, but I don't like that, so we're not doing that"?

When it comes to after death (or life-support/coma) decisions, it's the deceased's wishes that are upheld, not the family's.

EDIT: link
link (also talks about Trantra today)
link

As long as it does no harm. Do whatever anda want with your body.

I suppose if it's "consensual" and doesn't cause harm, then I don't have a problem with it. Just because I find something to be gross doesn't mean it should be illegal for everyone.

Although, I am a bit curious about how this would be regulated.

Not that this is actually likely to ever happen. Gay marriage hasn't even been legalized in most states.

Yes there should be a limit.

Necrophilia is a sexuality disorder just as pedophilia is. anda can't encourage it, anda need to treat it.

Consensual necrophilia is one of those "in these times, anda can practically do anything so let's come up with the most disturbing things!"-diseases of the western society if anda ask me :/

O________O Marc.....Marc why would anda even think about this? *shakes head* nevermind, i think necrophilia should be allowed under consent of the dead corpse, which i doubt will be popular, lol. husbands may get consent from dead wives, prostitutes may even consent for their body to continually be used for money! idk if it's possible but it crossed my mind, but think about what it would do to the families of the people who are being used for sexual purposes, it could destroy them emotionally knowing that their dead relative is being used for that, it could give them nightmares, depending on how close they are it could cause severe depression O_____O but, in the case of the medical safety of the volunteer, i think maybe they should sign something stating that they know what they are getting into. I think there are a lot of potentially dangerous sports that are completely within the law, eg. bungi jumping, sky diving :P the senarai goes on :P there anda gave it whiteflame55 ^ ^ my answer

I will say outright that I am against this issue. That is my personal opinion.
Secondly, I think the Debat may be made mute sejak the fact there is little chance of it becoming legal. In the US for example, can anda imagine a politian proposing such a bill? Right now I would say the majority of people would be against it on moral grounds. It is illeagal in the US, but individual states vary on the servarity of the crime from a misdemeanor to a felony.
The comparison of giving permision of organ donation, and that of granting permission to allow necrophilia is not a very good one. In my view point, donating organs is for the saving of another life. Consentual necrophillia basically gives permision to use a corpse as a sex toy. While some may not see a problem with that, I see it as a selfish act of person wanting only to satisfy thier sexual desires atau fantasy.
I tried to do a internet cari on the health risks of the practice. There were very few that discussed the physical effects on the living participant. Most sites talk about the treatment for a mental disorder. NOW, before anda jump on me, I did not call it a mental disorder, but most of the psychology community seems to. If it were legal, the person would have to take precautions to attempt selamat, peti deposit keselamatan sex. It would have to go beyond wearing a condom, since the vagina would not be the only part of a corpse to pose a threat. As a body decomposes, I would think, harmfull bacteria would develope over the entire body. Also, there would have to be a time set on how long it was selamat, peti deposit keselamatan to "use" the corpse. Now again I'm not in favor of this, but I'm trying to cover all angles.
Now, if the family of the deceased wished to make a legal challenge, it could draw out for months. Not, to be morbid, but I don't know how fresh the body would stay if put in a freezer.
Another legal problem would come from people interested in necrophilia, but without an opportunity. Now, if a person wanted to check the internet hard enough, they could find extreme pornography of necrophillia. Would it be reasonable to think the demand for such would create lebih videos. Let's face it, there are people that will do anything for money. Even if it means making a video of a real murder and rape of the corpes. So while some may consent, innocents could become victims.
This topic has taken me way out of my confort zone. I've refrained from arguing soley on my religous beliefs. Feel free to komen on anything anda may disagree on. Just remember this is a Debat site and I only gave my point of view.

Necrophilia isn't just obscene and gross- it's also dangerous and a health and safety risk.

YOUR HAVING SEX WITH A LIFELESS FUCKING CORPSE.
Whatever could go wrong? (sarcasm alert)

There comes a point when a corpse is but a rotting lump of flesh. Fungi starts to grow on it, it decomposes and is crawling with all kinds of harmful bacterium.

Its at the least, horribly unhygenic and could result in the offender contracting vomit-inducing diseases.

I feel obligated to post this......


I think it is disgusting(Contrary to the awesome pic), and it should not be allowed, but then again, who am I to say what other people can atau cannot do? My vote would be no, but like I said. It all depends, I suppose.

Good Lord yes.
There should be like a 36hour on if anda could keep a body if such a thing was allowed.
Bodies go bad pretty quickly.

I kind of think it comes down to my body, my choice. Now anyone considering donation should probably take their relatives feelings into account & warn them in advance. Its going to be a shock otherwise. I am dead I really can't say I care.