Even though now I have a gigantic wish to see Anna in 2-D animation, it wouldn't really make the story or characters better, it would just make the animation different (or better for some) So, I wouldn't really care either way. Though, it would make them way easier to edit and recolor XD

Let's face it, they're basically 2-D movies in 3-D animations clothing. The designs and stories are what you'd see in a 2-D film. I honestly would've liked them more if they were 2-D films. Tangled is one of my favorite movies EVER (not just Disney or animated movies), it's tied with Toy Story 3 as my 11th favorite movie. However, if it was in 2-D animation I would slightly like it more than Toy Story 3. The 3-D in their movies is great but 2-D animation suits them more. If you're wondering why I didn't include Brave in this it's because it's technically Pixar and all of their movies are 3-D so the animation suits it perfectly.

misscindeyspice I know, right? It's so difficult to make edits to 3-D characters!

Well, Tangled would be great had-drawn but then Rapunzel's hair wouldn't be that special, the same goes for Frozen and Elsa's ice powers and snow.

Yes to Tangled, no to Frozen, like I said before those character's were created for computer animation only, in my opinion Anna doesn't look that good, when it comes to Rapunzel Glen Keane wanted to give the impression of 2d in a 3d movie that's why he drew in the process of the movie to then be cover up with computer animation.

Then vote for "I would one but not the other" because that's basically what you're saying so you might as well vote.

Yes I would. I like 3-D animation when it's in Pixar-type movies like Toy Story 1,2, & 3 also some of the Dreamworks movies. But I loath it in the Disney Classic fairytale movie.

I'm not sure. Some things, like Rapunzel's hair and the lanterns in Tangled, and the snow/ice in Frozen look brilliant and I can't imagine how they'd look hand drawn. I personally prefer hand drawn by far.
I guess I just can't imagine that...though I'd love to see it.
Maybe I'll vote yes. But it's not a definite yes.

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.

I think it would have been so much more beautiful, graceful, magical, elegant, and so on and so forth. The "classic Disney magic" does better with classic Disney animation, rather than the clunky, modern, slap-stick CGI.

Yes to Frozen, no to Tangled. Frozen's animation was nice, but I would much rather prefer to see it hand drawn. :3

It doesn't matter to me

i like tangled in cgi fine. frozen i think would have been great 2d

I think I liked Tangled as 3-D. But Frozen would have been better as a 2-D gig. Even the icon that is in this poll for Elsa, makes Elsa look a million times better!!!!!

No, I don't really care about whether a movie is 2D or 3D. It makes no difference to me.

Sorry for that KataraLover I look quickly at the pool and though that there were only two choices Yes and No. I don't like when I do that. Hoo no, now I'm getting a little depressed.

I doubt it

I agree with Tygers, hand drawn movies are much more magical than CGI

Frozen was perfect in CGI. Tangled also looked very nice.

Although I grew up with 2D animations and is still a fan of it, the special effects like Rapunzel's hair and Elsa's power wouldn't look convincing and realistic as 2D animations.

Tangled in 2-d and less moderns stuff, let frozen waste away in the cgi world.

It would be an improvement, but would still dislike them.

Maybe! I'm not very sure about that though!