Logical reasons...
why Harry Potter v.s Twilight
*WARNING SPOILERS*
Hi! I'm Cinnominbubble and I have noticed the war between fandoms have been going on for a while with no clear outcome. There is a reason to this-We are stubborn. Twihards want to stick up for Stephanie Meyer, whilst Potterheads want to do the same for J. K. Rowling. But, I have noticed something. Many of our reasonings aren't exactly logical. I mean, not to be offensive, some of our strongest points are downright idiotic!(from both sides) I'd like to come up with some smarter points to help people see our side of the story, whatever that side may be! It would do well to expect lebih of these in the future because of all the idiocy going around.(Again, not to be offensive)
I am a peminat of Harry Potter but I'd like to acknowledge both sides to the story. People will be yelling at me at the end of this, so in advance, I say sorry for anything offensive.
-First off, I'd just like to say to anda twihards, Harry Potter came first in 1998, whereas Twilight came out in 2005, I believe. So J.K Rowling did not copy Stephanie Meyer. I am in possession of both these series' and though Jacob and Sirius both have the same last name, and can both transform into dog-like figures, that is where the similarities stop. Sirius Black is a prisoner escaped from the wizard prison, Azkaban, where he was placed under false pretences. He is an old friend of Harry's parents, and is also Harry's godfather. He is only able to become a dog because he is an animagus, a witch atau wizard with the ability to transform into a certain animal at will. He became an Animagus illegally in order to help his friend, Remus Lupin, who was a werewolf, through those bleak nights where there was a full moon. Serigala Jadian only attack humans and so Sirius was only selamat, peti deposit keselamatan while in his dog form. Jacob Black on the other hand, is not a real werewolf. In Breaking Dawn, his species is called Shape-shifters as Aro says himself. He is only a shape-shifter because it runs in his family and... Yah. That subject all cleared up? I hope so.
-I have heard people saying that Twilight is a better Cinta story but there's an easy answer to that... Harry Potter isn't a Cinta story. Sure, if anda are into that genre, go for Twilight, but is not fair to say that Harry Potter is a bad book just because it's not a romance novel.
-Yah, ok the Harry Potter characters have flaws! Bella and Rosalie seem to be the only ones with flaws in the entire series, Bella's being her disability to understand what goes on around her sometimes, and Rosalie's being over-the-top-jeolosy... Those don't even seem like flaws! Harry's cast on the other hand, has plenty of flaws. Hermione with her buck-teeth and bad posture, Mrs. Weasley with her over-protectiveness et cetera. But as someone in history said, Flaws are what give your character, well, character! There are plenty of people in Harry Potter with less flaws(Cho, Cedric, et al.) but flaws none the less. So again, if anda prefer buku where anda characters are close to perfect, be my guest and read Twilight. I personally found the characters lebih relatable,(mainly Hermione) with their flaws and anger management issues.
Now I know I haven't addressed most of the major questions, but I honestly can't remember anymore(it's 10:06 PM, I just came utama from piano! Cut me some slack please...wow I whine a lot!) Feel free to give me feedback, soalan and requests for my seterusnya article(this is my first for Logical Reasons) Go ahead, tell me how bad it is, cant get any worse than what I (or Ralph[inside joke]) tell myself:D I will sunting to accommodate all new questions, unless I get an overflow of questions. I will create an artikel for any point, if logical and/or if I understand/know of it. Since this is my first, I don't expect much. Just, if anda have any negative comments(Twihards, if I wrote something wrong etc.)tell me in non anugerah form(don't be angry)
Yours in demigodishness, and all that. Peace Out!
Cinnominbubble >.<
why Harry Potter v.s Twilight
*WARNING SPOILERS*
Hi! I'm Cinnominbubble and I have noticed the war between fandoms have been going on for a while with no clear outcome. There is a reason to this-We are stubborn. Twihards want to stick up for Stephanie Meyer, whilst Potterheads want to do the same for J. K. Rowling. But, I have noticed something. Many of our reasonings aren't exactly logical. I mean, not to be offensive, some of our strongest points are downright idiotic!(from both sides) I'd like to come up with some smarter points to help people see our side of the story, whatever that side may be! It would do well to expect lebih of these in the future because of all the idiocy going around.(Again, not to be offensive)
I am a peminat of Harry Potter but I'd like to acknowledge both sides to the story. People will be yelling at me at the end of this, so in advance, I say sorry for anything offensive.
-First off, I'd just like to say to anda twihards, Harry Potter came first in 1998, whereas Twilight came out in 2005, I believe. So J.K Rowling did not copy Stephanie Meyer. I am in possession of both these series' and though Jacob and Sirius both have the same last name, and can both transform into dog-like figures, that is where the similarities stop. Sirius Black is a prisoner escaped from the wizard prison, Azkaban, where he was placed under false pretences. He is an old friend of Harry's parents, and is also Harry's godfather. He is only able to become a dog because he is an animagus, a witch atau wizard with the ability to transform into a certain animal at will. He became an Animagus illegally in order to help his friend, Remus Lupin, who was a werewolf, through those bleak nights where there was a full moon. Serigala Jadian only attack humans and so Sirius was only selamat, peti deposit keselamatan while in his dog form. Jacob Black on the other hand, is not a real werewolf. In Breaking Dawn, his species is called Shape-shifters as Aro says himself. He is only a shape-shifter because it runs in his family and... Yah. That subject all cleared up? I hope so.
-I have heard people saying that Twilight is a better Cinta story but there's an easy answer to that... Harry Potter isn't a Cinta story. Sure, if anda are into that genre, go for Twilight, but is not fair to say that Harry Potter is a bad book just because it's not a romance novel.
-Yah, ok the Harry Potter characters have flaws! Bella and Rosalie seem to be the only ones with flaws in the entire series, Bella's being her disability to understand what goes on around her sometimes, and Rosalie's being over-the-top-jeolosy... Those don't even seem like flaws! Harry's cast on the other hand, has plenty of flaws. Hermione with her buck-teeth and bad posture, Mrs. Weasley with her over-protectiveness et cetera. But as someone in history said, Flaws are what give your character, well, character! There are plenty of people in Harry Potter with less flaws(Cho, Cedric, et al.) but flaws none the less. So again, if anda prefer buku where anda characters are close to perfect, be my guest and read Twilight. I personally found the characters lebih relatable,(mainly Hermione) with their flaws and anger management issues.
Now I know I haven't addressed most of the major questions, but I honestly can't remember anymore(it's 10:06 PM, I just came utama from piano! Cut me some slack please...wow I whine a lot!) Feel free to give me feedback, soalan and requests for my seterusnya article(this is my first for Logical Reasons) Go ahead, tell me how bad it is, cant get any worse than what I (or Ralph[inside joke]) tell myself:D I will sunting to accommodate all new questions, unless I get an overflow of questions. I will create an artikel for any point, if logical and/or if I understand/know of it. Since this is my first, I don't expect much. Just, if anda have any negative comments(Twihards, if I wrote something wrong etc.)tell me in non anugerah form(don't be angry)
Yours in demigodishness, and all that. Peace Out!
Cinnominbubble >.<
I don't want to hear about Harry Potter atau any other book right now. I'm not setting this up for a Debat about which is better. I just want to know seriously and honestly why anda Twilight peminat-peminat enjoy Membaca Twilight. I want to see an actual reason that Twilight is a good book.
If anda don't like Twilight, I don't want to hear anda saying anything bad about it. I just want to know why people like it. Because all the debate's I've seen have no actual reasons. They have HP peminat-peminat and Twihards going on about which book is better, but not why they like it.
I do actually want respectful Debat though. I want to discuss the reasons anda give, but nicely.
If anda can't be respectful of each other's opinions then just don't comment.
And I'm not trying to hate on Twilight, but if I disagree with anda I will Debat with you.
I don't know if there are other debate's about this, so I'm sorry if there are, but I didn't look.
I'm just rambling now so let's get onto it!
If anda don't like Twilight, I don't want to hear anda saying anything bad about it. I just want to know why people like it. Because all the debate's I've seen have no actual reasons. They have HP peminat-peminat and Twihards going on about which book is better, but not why they like it.
I do actually want respectful Debat though. I want to discuss the reasons anda give, but nicely.
If anda can't be respectful of each other's opinions then just don't comment.
And I'm not trying to hate on Twilight, but if I disagree with anda I will Debat with you.
I don't know if there are other debate's about this, so I'm sorry if there are, but I didn't look.
I'm just rambling now so let's get onto it!
(I didn't include plot, good characters, etc. because those are automatically included)
1. POTATO.
2. pirates
3. ninjas
4. An awesome pirate/ninja fight
5. Swords (preferably celestial bronze)
6. Closets (for Edward to hide deep inside)
7. giraffes
8. YOUR FACE
9. YOUR MOM
10. YOUR MOM'S FACE
11. Butterflies
12. Chuck Norris
13. Jet-packs
14. kittens
15. strip poker :D
16. hand lotion
17. Sue Sylvester
18. sherbet
19. 20 bassoon players :D
20. SNICKERS
21. Jedis
22. Druids :D
23. FREE ICE CREAM
24. A monkey called Jeeves who occasionally slaps Bella
25. YOU.
1. POTATO.
2. pirates
3. ninjas
4. An awesome pirate/ninja fight
5. Swords (preferably celestial bronze)
6. Closets (for Edward to hide deep inside)
7. giraffes
8. YOUR FACE
9. YOUR MOM
10. YOUR MOM'S FACE
11. Butterflies
12. Chuck Norris
13. Jet-packs
14. kittens
15. strip poker :D
16. hand lotion
17. Sue Sylvester
18. sherbet
19. 20 bassoon players :D
20. SNICKERS
21. Jedis
22. Druids :D
23. FREE ICE CREAM
24. A monkey called Jeeves who occasionally slaps Bella
25. YOU.
Is it just me, atau does it seem like most of the Twilight peminat-peminat feel that they have to write in capitol letters to get their points across? Personally i find it really annoying.
It's also a fact that if anda write in capitol letters IT TAKES LONGER FOR THE BRAIN TO PROCESS THE INFORMATION and therefore takes longer to read. Originally all the road signs (In England anyway) were written in capitol letters, until they were redone and someone found that smaller case letters were quicker to read. So they changed it.
So seterusnya time anda feel like shouting because your book sucks, don't write in capitols, but put...
*shouting*... at the begining of your speech.
Thank you. That is all.
It's also a fact that if anda write in capitol letters IT TAKES LONGER FOR THE BRAIN TO PROCESS THE INFORMATION and therefore takes longer to read. Originally all the road signs (In England anyway) were written in capitol letters, until they were redone and someone found that smaller case letters were quicker to read. So they changed it.
So seterusnya time anda feel like shouting because your book sucks, don't write in capitols, but put...
*shouting*... at the begining of your speech.
Thank you. That is all.