SNAPES POV

"Severus, your not eating again...you know thats bad for you" Dumbledore berkata lifting his goblet. I sighed. Duh i know it is...that is why i was not eating. As people may know, my look matches my attitude...black, unemotional, and lebih black. I nodded to the old man and looked away. Glancing to the one table, where the famous trio ate, i spotted the girl of the bunch lay her head down at the table. Not one bite was taken of her meal, and she held her stomach with a free hand. Potter patted her back and berkata some things to her, while the Weasly boy chewed on his chicken like it was...

I’ve read many lists pointing out Twilight “Plot Holes”, but lebih often than not, the lists aren’t very valid at all. Half of them are usually just complaints, pointing out something they don’t like about Twilight (Example:” Why would Vampires go to high school?”, atau “Why does Bella have so many friends?”). The rest are just factually incorrect, atau can be logically theorized. These are usually followed sejak “Stephenie Meyer obviously ditched history class”, atau “Hasn’t Stephenie ever heard of logic?”, atau my personal favorite, “I would know, I had a lesson about it...

“Harry Potter is the End of an Era. Twilight is the End of an Error.”

At first glance, anda would think this is just another oh-so-clever Anti-Twilight slogan, reiterated sejak the Twilight hating masses, but in reality, are these antis only slamming themselves?



First off, what Era is Harry Potter ending? It’s own? So in other words, “Harry Potter is the end of Harry Potter”.

I’m assuming this “Error” is meant to represent Twilight, correct? So in other words, much like the above, “Twilight is the end of Twilight”.

In conclusion, “Harry Potter is the End of Harry Potter. Twilight...

Legitimate Reasons (I hope :x)
Harry Potter
1. The plot is intricate and detailed, covering easily lebih than forty-three years (from the time Voldemort rose to power, to the epilogue in DH) and seven buku with hardly any soalan left unturned. The subplots, which may seem mild and unimportant in book one, actually end up being important later on (case #1: Harry learning to fly becomes important later in book one).

2. The characters are deep and complex – there's a lot lebih to them than meets the eye and JK makes sure that we know it (case #2: Severus being an keldai to Harry). She had every...

As anda can tell, I do not like Twilight. However, there is one character in the "saga" that I definatley agree with. That person happens to be... Rosalie.

Sure Rosalie is a jalang, perempuan jalang most of the time, but when anda watch her in "Eclipse" [my sister made me watch all the movies] anda actually discover why she acts like that, especially towards Bella, and to be honest, I can't really blame her. In fact, I actually felt bad for her, and heres why:

In "Eclipse" Rosalie explains to Bella about what it's like to be a vampire, and the consequences. Rosalie was once a human in the 1930's era who had so many...

So we all know who Bella is, complete muggle and interfering with the magical world. The Department of International Magical Cooperation and the Department of Magic Reversal are overlooking claims, as shown on that post on My Life Is Twilight. I know this has been covered a lot, but I'm going to go in a bit further on what makes Muggles like her so much.

In several articles, Bella was described as an empty shell, meaning any girl can relate to her. This fits, because we know that she's only described as clumsy. Well, so are hundreds of millions of people in the world...so they could fit into...