TV TROPES AND MICHAEL DAWSON
While Membaca the TV TROPES site on Heroic BSOD for Live Action Televisyen series, I read this passage about the Michael Dawson character from "LOST":
"Let's face it, Michael's death was the best thing that happened, because, well, his character wasn't all that useful, other than being an in-universe joke on why some people really shouldn't be parents.".
The artikel earlier made this komen about the fans' reaction to Michael:
"While we're on the subject of Lost, let's mention Michael who might be the show's punching bag as he goes through the entire series stuck this way because of his son Walt... after all, he spends half an episode calling "Walt!" in several different screams and shouts."
Apparently, the penulis of this particular website (or page) had decided to make Michael a punching bag, as well. Not only did the penulis declared Michael as "useless" because he "shouldn't be a parent", that person also continued that asnine and never ending joke about Michael calling out the name of his kidnapped son, Walt Lloyd. Yet, TV TROPES also claimed that Kate Austen had "adopted" Claire Littleton's son Aaron. Adopted . . . instead of . . . say, KIDNAPPED, which is what really happened. Kate had kidnapped Aaron, sejak claiming to be his natural mother and deliberately kept him from his blood grandmother for nearly three years. Why? Because she selfishly wanted to use Aaron as comforting blanket for the trauma she had suffered during the Oceanic Six's departure from the island.
But TV TROPES never revealed this about Kate. Yet, at the same time, condemned Michael as someone who should not be a parent, because Walt ended up kidnapped (at gunpoint) sejak the Others. atau was he condemned as "useless", because he spent several episodes calling out Walt's name - something that the average parent would do if his atau her child had been kidnapped in that fashion.
I cannot help but wonder . . . if Michael had been portrayed sejak a white actor, would he have been labeled as the series' punching bag and running joke sejak the fans? atau would they have brushed aside atau make excuses for his flaws and mistakes, as they tend to do for fanboy favorite, James "Sawyer" Ford? Does this mean that the site authors for TV TROPES are racists atau simply hypocrites?
While Membaca the TV TROPES site on Heroic BSOD for Live Action Televisyen series, I read this passage about the Michael Dawson character from "LOST":
"Let's face it, Michael's death was the best thing that happened, because, well, his character wasn't all that useful, other than being an in-universe joke on why some people really shouldn't be parents.".
The artikel earlier made this komen about the fans' reaction to Michael:
"While we're on the subject of Lost, let's mention Michael who might be the show's punching bag as he goes through the entire series stuck this way because of his son Walt... after all, he spends half an episode calling "Walt!" in several different screams and shouts."
Apparently, the penulis of this particular website (or page) had decided to make Michael a punching bag, as well. Not only did the penulis declared Michael as "useless" because he "shouldn't be a parent", that person also continued that asnine and never ending joke about Michael calling out the name of his kidnapped son, Walt Lloyd. Yet, TV TROPES also claimed that Kate Austen had "adopted" Claire Littleton's son Aaron. Adopted . . . instead of . . . say, KIDNAPPED, which is what really happened. Kate had kidnapped Aaron, sejak claiming to be his natural mother and deliberately kept him from his blood grandmother for nearly three years. Why? Because she selfishly wanted to use Aaron as comforting blanket for the trauma she had suffered during the Oceanic Six's departure from the island.
But TV TROPES never revealed this about Kate. Yet, at the same time, condemned Michael as someone who should not be a parent, because Walt ended up kidnapped (at gunpoint) sejak the Others. atau was he condemned as "useless", because he spent several episodes calling out Walt's name - something that the average parent would do if his atau her child had been kidnapped in that fashion.
I cannot help but wonder . . . if Michael had been portrayed sejak a white actor, would he have been labeled as the series' punching bag and running joke sejak the fans? atau would they have brushed aside atau make excuses for his flaws and mistakes, as they tend to do for fanboy favorite, James "Sawyer" Ford? Does this mean that the site authors for TV TROPES are racists atau simply hypocrites?