jawab soalan ini

True Blood Soalan

The TV series are almost NOTHING like the books- ain't that frustrates anda a tiny bit? I mean honestly...

*
I think the tunjuk is good they stick to some things but i dont like how easy sookie forgave bill its annoying I HATE BILL...
courtneykutie posted hampir setahun yang lalu
*
the shows r made on general vision. We dn't get to see what we expect b'coz it's and individual vision, our own imagination..! I guess that's why the shows r this way.
Gagung posted hampir setahun yang lalu
 -POKERface posted hampir setahun yang lalu
next question »

True Blood Jawapan

tinkymel said:
Ok here is the thing. I have read all the buku and Cinta them so much. I didn't find the buku till after season one. And Season one really did a wonderful job of sticking to the books, but adding a little bit of it's own color to it. Half of Season two was ok, but they took a minor plot and made it huge/stupid and decreased the importance of the major plot. Season three is just messing character's family trees, personalities, and story lines all up. I understand the need to change some things, but they are changing too man important things. Sookie wouldn't forgive Bill that easily, especially because it is all out there now instead of later. If anda read the buku they are also changing the relationships between characters. It doesn't help that Alan has already berkata who he thinks Sookie should be with, no matter what the buku say. I just think they need to get back to the basics and just add color, not completely desimate things.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
Yeah, that's what I think as well. We don't hear about Erics maker till the last book & in TV shows, he's already dead. + Sookie is WITH Eric & she feels SOMETHING for him atau not anything at all ¬¬
-POKERface posted hampir setahun yang lalu
Asvini said:
I'm glad the tunjuk doesn't just mimic the books. I haven't read past the first yet, but I fully intend to, and I wouldn't bother if they and the tunjuk were identical. I understand people liking the buku more, but no matter how good the buku are, recreating their story exactly is pointless. That story already exists, if people want to experience it again they can just read the buku again. What point atau need is there to exactly duplicate an already existing story? I'd quit watching and just have the buku if it was just them all over again. An exact recreation can work for a book-to-movie (sometimes) but not for a book-to-tv tunjuk in my opinion.

Not to mention that telah diberi the amount of buku in the series it would be hard for them to do a book a season without ending half way through the story. Most even very successful shows either run out of steam atau end sejak the 10th season, usually earlier, and the buku are already 10 with lebih to come last I heard. They'd probably have to eventually either cram multiple buku into single seasons (which would seem rushed and ruin keseluruhan arcs) atau simply end before the story did to follow the books.

I think people should judge the tunjuk on it's own merits without automatically hating anything changed. Sure, compare, and thinking the buku did it better is completely valid, but some write off plots they may otherwise have liked as a knee jerk reaction to change. To me that's like throwing away your season 2 dvd and buying a saat copy of season 1 if anda liked it better. Sure, liking s1 better is completely valid, but that doesn't mean anda need it twice.

Though for the record I think there's a difference between changing events and changing message, so things like making Sookie seem lebih naive, stupid atau quick to forgive Bill than I hear she is in the corresponding book (not up to that book yet), I completely understand peminat-peminat being angry, and don't think they should make that sort of change. I'm fine with them changing the events to make a new story, but I do agree with book peminat-peminat that changing a character to have them send a worse message is wrong. If Alan Ball wants Bill/Sookie he'd need to remove the 'Bad Bill' plots, rather than just removing Sookie's reaction like he currently seems to be. While I'm fine with changing events I think changing message and weakening the heroine just to serve your liking of a character is wrong, and understandably annoying for peminat-peminat of both the tunjuk and books. I'm fine with him altering events somewhat, but don't turn Sookie Stackhouse into Bella angsa, swan for heavens sake...Sookie Stackhouse is better.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
Nobody berkata anything bad about Sookie Stackhouse, I didn;t even mention her. & Tbh, nobody really wants Bill with Sookie. Since that would be like, Edward and Bella but for grown ups. I;m just saying, that they're changing everything TOO much. It's suppose to follow SOME plot. And the plot comes from where? the books. Charlainne Harris. + It wouldn't be like re-watching what anda already read atau something, it'd just be your imagination coming to life. For example, I wanted to see JB Du Rone (since he was in the buku and NOT in the show). Godrick? He didn;t come until the flipping book.
-POKERface posted hampir setahun yang lalu
*
*the last flipping book
-POKERface posted hampir setahun yang lalu
*
Er, what? I didn't say anyone here had berkata anything bad about Sookie Stackhouse, I was explaining why I think changing the stregnth of the heroine is lebih of a problem for me than changing the plot events. A few book peminat-peminat have told me they felt Sookie has been weakened in the tunjuk lately compared to book Sookie, and I was explaining why I agree that's a shame. I didn't imply anyone wanted Bill with Sookie either, I was talking about the show's creator Alan Ball, and how he seems to be favouring Bill in a way the buku don't. If anda only wanted to hear the opinion of those who agree with you, why bother asking? In your opinion they should stick lebih closely to the books, and that's fine, but in my opinion it's good for them to make enough changes to be a different story with the same base rather than a retelling of a story that's already out there.
Asvini posted hampir setahun yang lalu
bri-marie said:
Not really. Like Asvani (sp?) said, it would get boring after a while. It's not like it's a movie, they've made it into a TV show. The seasons are only twelve episodes long to begin with, if they followed the buku to a t, there would be less episodes.

I also like that we get to see what the other characters are doing, not just Sookie. I think it allows anda room to grow attached to the others and provides lebih drama and suspense. Yes, there are certain things I wish they hadn't changed (making Sookie seem weaker than she really is, for starters). I'm normally one of those people who hate it when something doesn't follow the buku it's based off of, but True Blood doesn't bother me that much.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
Again, I'm not saying I want only Sookies point off view. God no. I fell in Cinta with Pam, Jessica and all that. I guess it's ok for some changes, i.e Bill being Jessica's maker, but not the really big ones, like Sookie forgiving Bill and making her look so weak and all that.
-POKERface posted hampir setahun yang lalu
OceanCoast said:
I COULDN'T STAND IT! if the tunjuk was exactly like the books. I like the deviation the tunjuk provides because it takes the characters I fell in Cinta with in the books, and puts them into different storylines that I didn't know were coming. Its like Alan Ball berkata anda have to treat the tunjuk and the buku completely separate. I do this and it makes watching True Blood much lebih enjoyable, instead of getting angry when something has been changed (or completely removed) I can just sit back and watch and have a good time.

Now having berkata that, there are *key* elements that happened in the books, that if removed from the Televisyen tunjuk would be a big mistake for where the characters we loved would be headed. I'm not talking specific scenes and/or scenarios, but character storyline arcs that span several of the books. If removed would make the tunjuk version inconsistent since they did set up season 1 very similar to the book, and if they remove the *key* moments in season3+ it would make for some huge plot holes that could be avoided if they simply followed the book series BIG MOMENTS.

I hope that makes sense because it was a giant rambling mess in my head lol.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
It doesn't make sense
-POKERface posted hampir setahun yang lalu
sherylllin said:
uh, the series is based on the buku not the buku as a series...it is delightful to see how the writers weave the tale!
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
Joycrazy said:
Honestly lebih no then yes. Can anda imagine the tunjuk without Layfette atau Jessica? Isn't Russell the best villian to date? Yes I do find Sookie a bit a pushover. But every season she's menunjukkan lebih spine. Also I wouldn't be watching a tunjuk where I know what was going to happen. I couldn't imagine anything lebih boring.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
next question »