There is the ranking of bahagian, atas 6 Defence Against The Dark Arts Teachers, The number 1 means the Best, While the number 6 means the worst.
List:
*1. Remus Lupin - Because He is Affable, Friendly, Polite, Wise, Intelligent, Reasonable and Kind-Hearted Gentleman, Despite He is Were-Wolf.
*2. Alastor "Mad-Eye" Moody - Because He is Cool and Awesome in his own way, He reminds me of Doctor N.Gin from Crash Bandicoot Video Games.
*3. Severus Snape - He is maybe a Snarky, Sarcastic, Stoic, Icy and Cold Person on the Outside, But He can be a Good Person on the Inside.
*4. Gilderoy Lockhart - Because He is Vain, Narcissistic, Over-Confident, Cocky and Foppish Showboat, But He is very Hilarious.
*5. Quirinus Quirrell - Because He is Shy, Meek, Timid and Nervous, But He is a Plot-Twist Villain.
*6. Dolores Umbridge - Because She is a Monstrous and Sadistic Jerk without any Sympathetic, Reasonable, Redeemable and Positive Qualities.
List:
*1. Remus Lupin - Because He is Affable, Friendly, Polite, Wise, Intelligent, Reasonable and Kind-Hearted Gentleman, Despite He is Were-Wolf.
*2. Alastor "Mad-Eye" Moody - Because He is Cool and Awesome in his own way, He reminds me of Doctor N.Gin from Crash Bandicoot Video Games.
*3. Severus Snape - He is maybe a Snarky, Sarcastic, Stoic, Icy and Cold Person on the Outside, But He can be a Good Person on the Inside.
*4. Gilderoy Lockhart - Because He is Vain, Narcissistic, Over-Confident, Cocky and Foppish Showboat, But He is very Hilarious.
*5. Quirinus Quirrell - Because He is Shy, Meek, Timid and Nervous, But He is a Plot-Twist Villain.
*6. Dolores Umbridge - Because She is a Monstrous and Sadistic Jerk without any Sympathetic, Reasonable, Redeemable and Positive Qualities.
I recently found a strange contradiction in the concept of wizarding money.I'd like to know if my idea is true atau if there is a counter-argument against it.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured sejak magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured sejak magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
