Human Rights Club
sertai
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
After my last article, and the discussion going on over at the link, I've been thinking a lot about the rights of a child, atau a fetus as the case may be.

The phrase in the UN Declaration of Human Rights is “All human beings are born free and equal,” a modern rephrasing of the US Declaration of Independence’s “All men are created equal.” But what does the phrase “everyone” atau “all human beings” entail? Does it really mean everyone? Immanuel Wallerstein points out the problems with being so absolute:

“… It is almost universally agreed that an infant does not have these rights, atau at least not all of them, on the obvious grounds that an infant does not have the mental capacity to exercise them wisely, if at all, for himself atau others. But if we agree about infants, then what about, successively, the senile aged, small children, sociopaths, atau felons… the young, the neurotic, the soldiers, the aliens, the uneducated, the poor, the women? Where is the self-evident line that distinguishes capacity from incapacity?”

Since the line is thin and constantly shifting, Wallerstein explains that it is impossible to define it precisely. I believe that certain rights apply to rational human beings. But how do anda define a rational human being? Just because someone doesn’t think atau act in a way that the majority would deem rational, does that mean that he atau she is irrational? Rationalism can be defined as: “governed by, atau menunjukkan evidence of, clear and sensible thinking and judgment, based on reason rather than emotion atau prejudice.” Out of all the definitions I looked for (Webster, Oxford), this one from Encarta was the most descriptive one, but they all berkata pretty much the same thing. But if someone is overly emotional, and therefore irrational according to this definition, does that mean they do not deserve human rights?

My roommate brought up the opinion that even though an infant does not have adequate mental capacity to exercise some rights effectively, the infant ought to be entitled to basic rights (like the right to life). This reminded me of the abortion argument I brought up here. But when the right of one person competes with the right of another, which person is dominant? If “all human beings are born equal,” and if no life is worth lebih atau less than anyone else’s, how can we even determine? Though an infant does not fit the definition of “rational,” s/he will become so in a few years. In the limbo of his/her life between birth and rationalization, what rights is the infant entitled to? What of the other groups Wallerstein mentioned? When do they have rights, and what rights do they have, if not the ones outlined in the UNDHR? On bahagian, atas of that, a fetus is not yet "born." Does that mean that the fetus is not a human being, entitled to basic human rights?

I ask a lot of soalan in this article, maybe I should answer them sometimes. I decided to look into some treaty-based enforcement of rights, like the link (Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women) and the link (Convention on the Rights of the Child) to see if they answered some of my questions.

According to the CRC, the rights of a child are divided into three groups: survival and development rights, protection rights, and participation rights. And the UN does not just specify rights for children.

The recently agreed upon UN Declaration on the link states in the saat paragraph that: “Disabled persons shall enjoy all the rights set forth in this Declaration. These rights shall be granted to all disabled persons without any exception whatsoever and without distinction atau discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, language, religion, political atau other opinions, national atau social origin, state of wealth, birth atau any other situation applying either to the disabled person himself atau herself atau to his atau her family.” It goes on to specify rights specifically for the disabled, including the right to be respected, the right to the same civil and political rights as others, the right to try and achieve self-reliance, the right to medical care, etc.

The link (Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination) and the CEDAW also interested me because they both tackle the issue of racism and sexism, which is a very old crime against human rights that still persists in our society.

I was also interested in the link, so I looked that up too. In 1976 in Paraguay, Joelito Filartiga, the seventeen-year-old son of Dr. Joel Filartiga, a prominent opponent of the Paraguayan government, was kidnapped and tortured to death sejak Americo Norberto Pena-Irala in retaliation for Dr. Filartiga's political activities. Dr. Filartiga tried to seek justice in his own country and was denied. His daughter (the victim's sister) fled to the States, pursued sejak Pena-Irala, and filed a civil suit against him for the torture and murder of her brother. The US courts had never before taken an international case.

Basically, the importance of the case was its landmark achievements and the results. In the United States, the ruling of the case created “crucial new remedies for victims and survivors of torture in their quest to hold their torturers accountable for their crimes.” Of course, as this law changed and expanded over time, it also included other violations of the “law of nations” like disappearances and other things.

It seems that this case occurred before the link was created, but the U.N. Declaration Against Torture was cited in the case. I thought the case was interesting because it was done without the aid of the UN itself, only its documents. It shows that the UN and other organizations aren’t the only ones defending human rights, but governments are (sometimes) looking out for the welfare of everyone, whether they are a citizen atau not.

Well, that's all well and good, anda may say, but I haven't really answered my soalan yet, have I? I've discussed at great length what UN documents have done for human rights, but still leave the soalan about who exactly is entitled to these rights hanging in the air.

Essentially, and due mostly to the wording of the UNDHR, a fetus hasn't exactly been "born" and is therefore not considered a person sejak the UNDHR. That does not mean that the child does not have rights. It's a very sticky issue, and one that cannot be answered sejak analyzing all the UN documents on the subject because there IS no UN document on the subject. Not even the CEDAW really addresses the subject. The REAL soalan is, should there be a Convention on the Rights of a Fetus? If so, what would those rights entail?

I pose these soalan in a rhetorical nature to inspire thought on the issue, but if anda wish to respond, I would Cinta to hear your thoughts.

Other Human Rights Treaties
link
link
afghan Member of Parliament Malalai Joya speaks about the troubling and declining status of women's rights in Afghanistan. Interview recorded September 2006. lebih info: www.malalaijoya.com Copyright © 2006 Intrinsic Audiovisual Productions
video
human rights
women's rights
afghanistan
added by Cinders
PREDA is a charitable organization founded since the tahun 1974 in Olongapo City, Philippines. Its main goal and purpose is to promote and protect the dignity and the Human Rights of the Filipino people especially of women and children.
video
human rights
children's rights
philippines
preda
cnn
video
human rights
women's rights
domestic violence
Film bintang and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Goodwill Ambassador Antonio Banderas launched a global video appeal to end violence against women in recognition of International Women's hari
video
human rights
women's rights
t's 2014 and women around the world are still being abused, objectified and silenced. Yet, women are half of the world's potential and every single one has the right to a life free from discrimination.
video
human rights
women's rights
he for she
gender equality
speak up
Copied and edited from: link


link

THIS IS VERY URGENT AND NOT A JOKE! ALSO DON'T GOOF OFF!!!!

I really mean it! What would anda be able to do if SOPA/TPP censors the internet? What would anda be able to do if Penulisan fanfics and drawing fanarts become illegal? What would anda do if it's illegal to do a cover of your kegemaran song on YouTube? What would anda do if downloading things from the internet (music, movies, TV episodes, etc) became illegal? What would anda do if SOPA/TPP wins the war and takes away internet freedom? Net Neutrality is already dead so far, we can't risk the freedom of internet...
continue reading...
added by alyssa-lauren
video
unicef
child survival
Retired Watts schoolteacher Carolfrances Likins talks about loving being a teacher and her dislike for what was done to education in the school system. lebih videos: link
video
education
teachers
school
los angeles
united farm workers
ufw
human rights
One of the most inspirational speeches in recorded history was telah diberi sejak a comedian sejak the name of Charlie Chaplin. Available in other languages. See YouTube information for details.
video
human rights
charlie chaplin
the great dictator
the greatest speech ever made
humanity
freedom
liberty
added by blind_moon
Youth for Human Rights - Human Right #24: The Right to Play
video
human rights
youth for human rights
Take action at link
video
human rights
gay rights
hate crimes
video
unicef
undernourished children
niger
added by alyssa-lauren
video
women's rights
unicef
campaign
In recalling an event where she was confronted sejak misogyny, trans-phobia, and racism all at once, Laverne Cox advocates for Cinta and clarifies what makes a bully.
video
human rights
women's rights
trans rights
tolerance
mothers2mothers(m2m), is a program across Africa, designed to help HIV-positive pregnant women care for themselves and avoid transmission of the virus to their babies.
video
mothers2mothers
world aids hari
hiv
children
mothers
pregnancy
Millions are vulnerable to HIV infection through lack of prevention & those living with HIV don't have access to treatment & care. Universal access to HIV prevention, treatment & care is the key to ending the global AIDS epidemic.
video
hiv
aids
avert
world aids hari
epidemic
2009
universal access
De Nadie is a documentary sejak Mexican filmmaker Tin Dirdamal on the impoverished Central Americans who leave their countries in hope of a better life in the United States.
video
human rights
de nadie
no one
documentary
immigration
abuses
rape
assault
central america
mexico
added by Cinders
Sudan and its Friends -- Syria, Saudi Arabia, China -- deny the atrocities in Darfur, and attack the members of the mission on Darfur as headed sejak Jody Williams. UN Watch confronts Sudan and its allies.
video
sudan
darfur
genocide
united nations
un watch
geneva
human rights
Taina Bien-Aime, Executive Director of Equality Now, an international human rights organization that works for the protection of the rights of women and girls, gives a graphic senarai of horrendous abuses faced sejak women around the world today.
video
human rights
women's rights
equality now
genital mutilation
wife beating
child brides
saudi arabia