Fotografi Club
sertai
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
In 1994, South African photojournalist Kevin Carter won the Pulitzer prize for his disturbing photograph of a Sudanese child being stalked sejak a burung bangkai, vulture (left). That same year, Kevin Carter committed suicide.

Without the facts surrounding his death, this behavior may seem surprising. But Carter received heaps of criticism for his actions. While in Sudan, near the village of Ayod, Carter found a small, emaciated toddler struggling to make her way to the Makanan station. When she stopped to rest, a burung bangkai, vulture landed nearby with his eyes on the little girl. Carter took twenty minit to take the photo, wanting the best shot possible, before chasing the bird away.

The foto was published in The New York Times in March of 1993, and sparked a wide reaction. People wanted to know what happened the child, and if Carter had assisted her. The Times issued a statement saying that the girl was able to make it to the Makanan station, but beyond that no one knows what happened to her. Because of this, Carter was bombarded with soalan about why he did not help the girl, and only used her to take a photograph. The St. Petersburg Times in Florida berkata this of Carter: "The man adjusting his lens to take just the right frame of her suffering, might just as well be a predator, another burung bangkai, vulture on the scene." Filmmaker Dan Krauss said, "In his famous picture of the burung bangkai, vulture stalking the Sudanese girl, I began to see the embodiment of his troubled psyche. I believe Kevin did, too. In the starving child, he saw Africa's suffering; in the preying vulture, he saw his own face." Carter's daughter Megan responded to such comparisons with, "I see my dad as the suffering child. And the rest of the world is the vulture."

However, Carter was working in a time when photojournalists were told not to touch famine victims for fear of spreading disease. Carter estimated that there were twenty people per jam dying at the Makanan center. The child was not unique. Regardless, Carter often expressed regret that he had not done anything to help the girl, even though there was not much that he could have done, in all actuality.

 (the AWB) begs for his life shortly before being executed sejak a Bophuthatswana policeman after an abortive attempt to prop up the tyrannical regime of the homeland of Bophuthatswana, March, 1994.
(the AWB) begs for his life shortly before being executed sejak a Bophuthatswana policeman after an abortive attempt to prop up the tyrannical regime of the homeland of Bophuthatswana, March, 1994.
Carter is the tragic example of the toll photographing such suffering can take on a person. Along with his famous photograph, Carter has captured such things as a public necklacing execution in 1980s South Africa, along with the violence of the time, including shootouts and other executions. Carter spoke of his thoughts when he took these photographs: "I had to think visually. I am zooming in on a tight shot of the dead guy and a splash of red. Going into his khaki uniform in a pool of blood in the sand. The dead man's face is slightly gray. anda are making a visual here. But inside something is screaming, 'My God.' But it is time to work. Deal with the rest later. If anda can't do it, get out of the game."

Carter's suicide is not a direct result of the Sudanese child, nor the accusations that he staged the scene, atau criticisms that he did not assist her. Carter had spiraled into a depression, to which many things were a factor, his vocation as a photojournalist in 1980s Africa definitely a large part of it. Carter and his Friends Ken Oosterbroek, Greg Marinovich, and Joao Silva longed to expose the brutality of Apartheid to the world. They captured the violence of South Africa so vividly that a Johannesburg magazine Living dubbed them "The Bang-Bang Club." The tajuk stuck.

On April 18, 1994, only 6 days after Carter won the Pulitzer, the Bang-Bang Club made their way to Tokowa to photograph an outbreak of violence there. At around noon, Carter returned to the city, and heard later on the radio that Oosterbroek had been killed in the conflict, and that Marinovich had been seriously wounded. It was obvious to his Friends that Carter blamed himself for Oosterbroek's death, and he even confided in his Friends that he felt as though he "should have taken the bullet."

Oosterbroek's death hit Carter hard, and little things in his life began to fall apart. He was constantly haunted sejak the atrocities that he had witnessed through the years, and finally, on July 27, 1994, Carter backed his red Nissan truck against a blue gum tree, attached a garden hose to the exhaust pipe, and rolled up the window to his car. He turned on his walkman and rested his head against his backpack until he died of carbon monoxide poisoning.

Carter has become a symbol in the arts. In music, Manic jalan Preachers recorded a song about him, with his name as its title. In literature, Mark Z. Danielewski based his character Will Navidson off of Carter, and even described a photograph identical to Carter's Sudanese child in his novel. In theater, the Junction Avenue Theater Company uses the character of Saul to portray the difficulties of being a photographer in Apartheid South Africa in their play Tooth and Nail.

Excerpts from Cater's suicide note read: "I'm really, really sorry. The pain of life overrides the joy to the point that joy does not exist...depressed ... without phone ... money for rent ... money for child support ... money for debts ... money! ... I am haunted sejak the vivid memories of killings & corpses & anger & pain ... of starving atau wounded children, of trigger-happy madmen, often police, of killer executioners... I have gone to sertai Ken if I am that lucky."
added by -lostgirl-
Source: me!
added by emmett
Source: Google imej
added by Rodz
Source: Rodienne Vee
added by paniclover21
Source: me
added by KanonKyu
Source: Fotografi peminat art made sejak me - KanonKyu
added by Racheljohn
added by Andressa_Weld
Source: Tumblr
added by ivanaoshea
added by Blue85
Source: Me
added by falloutboyL
added by paniclover21
added by Blue85
added by Office_001
Source: Me!
added by ineedcoffee
Source: ineedcoffee/chey knapp
added by TmoVie_obsessed
added by Cladra
Source: Cladra
added by amazondebs
Source: Debbie Taylor
added by cleavisde
Source: cleavisde
Chroma keying is completely different from editing the picture; although there are many similar techniques/processes involved in both of these. Many amateur shutterbugs involved in green screen Fotografi often use the standard picture atau video editing software for replacing the backgrounds and giving the final touch. The extensive Photoshop and After Effects have been useful for Chroma keying but experts recommend using specialized green screen software. Here are some of the major reasons that justify their recommendation.

Chroma Key Software offer quicker editing

Many such software offers...
continue reading...
added by KanonKyu
Source: Sweet Cat Fotografi