jawab soalan ini

Harry Potter Soalan

In COS, the chamber was opened 50 years before, when Riddle was 15. Hagrid was at Hogwarts, so at least 11. So, wouldn't Hagrid and Voldemort have to be in their mid 60's?? Tney aren't described as that old in the buku atau movies..

*
good question-i was wondering the same exact thing.
laureng114 posted hampir setahun yang lalu
*
i'll have an answer later, i have to think about it
musicluva1219 posted hampir setahun yang lalu
*
but they both are.
LeviTheAckerman posted hampir setahun yang lalu
 howdyimliz posted hampir setahun yang lalu
next question »

Harry Potter  jawapan terbaik

thisisaparade said:
My opinion is that Voldemort stopped aging when he started making Horcruxes and Hagrid ages slower than most because of his giant blood. They both look younger than they truly are.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
next question »

Jawapan

swimswamswum said:
Wizards and magical folk live longer than Muggles.

Also, J.K. didn't really describe there age. Also, Voldemort went through many magical transformations probably making his age unknowable.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
hpSNLto16 said:
The buku also never describe them as being younger, so since JKR berkata that they were about 15 when the CoS was open in the books, then yeah, they must be about 65.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
ha ha i know logically it must be true, its just so different to how I pictured them! thanks!
howdyimliz posted hampir setahun yang lalu
bri-marie said:
Wizard's don't age like humans do. They age a lot slower. Dumbledore and his brother (and probably McGonagal) are both in their hundreds when Dumbledore dies in the Half-Blood Prince.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
Sappp said:
Here are the dates copied from the HP lexicon who have thought about this a lot lebih than I did.

Harry Potter CS - 1992-1993
The Chamber would have been opened in schoolyear 1942-1943. Hagrid was in his third year.
Voldemort's tarikh of birth - 31 decemer c1926
Hagrid's tarikh of birth -December 6, 1928

In Philosopher's Stone Hagrid would have been 63, Voldemort (or what he was at that moment) 65.

Their age is not really described in the books, but like others berkata wizards don't age as muggles do and Hagrid also has giant blood.

select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
BTW: the harry potter lexicon: link
Sappp posted hampir setahun yang lalu
angel_hater said:
well dumbledore was like 114 atau something when he died, so they do live longer than muggles dont they?
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
115 srry that would bug me
alicerox1 posted hampir setahun yang lalu
EdwardCohen said:
Hagrid was in his 3rd tahun at hogwarts when it was opened so he was 13.Tom told everyone the Hagrid opened it so he got expelled but he stayed at hogwarts 50years later it was opened so anda add 13 and 50 together which is 13 + 50 = 63 . So in COS hagrid was about 63 years old
Hope this helps
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
sophdoph42 said:
I don't know about Hagrid, could be something to do with him being half-giant.
Voldemort was drinking unikorn blood and making Horcruxes and all that funny stuff so he probably doesn't age like normal humans atau age at all.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
LadyNottingham said:
The Harry Potter Lexicon is your friend ! (And mine, don't worry.)

Yes, both Hagrid and Voldemort are not that young. However, keep in mind that wizards' lifetime is about twice the Muggles'. See how Aunt Muriel is (in DH, she's 107), atau Dumbledore who died (prematurely) at 115 atau so.

Besides, Hagrid is a half-giant. Giants may have a longer lifetime. According to the Lexicon, he would have been born on Dec. 6, 1928. So he was a young student when Tom Marvolo Riddle was a prefect.

As for Voldemort... he almost died a first time (in 1981, courtesy of Lily's sacrifice to save her son). He came back from almost nowhere in 1995 (in the infamous graveyard scene). He had undergone so many transformations throughout his life due to Dark Magic that he's got practically nothing human left. According to the Lexicon, he's born on Dec. 31, 1926, so he was 71 when he died for good in May 1998.

Of interest : Minerva McGonagall was born on October 4, 1925, according to the Lexicon.

Here's the link to the Lexicon, for any future references - that's useful ! :
link
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
Think that is also part of what makes Severus Snape's story so tragic in my mind. To die at his young age, after such a life of strife and struggle.
karenmiller1972 posted hampir setahun yang lalu
*
Completely. He was not even 40 (OMG, I'm older than him now ! - I've begun Membaca HP at that very age, 38, I felt strange then that I was as old as my fav character when he died). Lifespan is almost double for wizards, 40 is quite younger, younger than for Muggles (and it is already young for Muggles !) That's why I can't kill him in my stories. A close call is OK, but no dying.
LadyNottingham posted hampir setahun yang lalu
DarkTemptation said:
That's actaully been puzzling me for a while, but i guess that Voldemort doesn't age anymore thanks to the horcruxes and that Hagrid....well- he's just Hagrid...giant blood must make them age slowly atau something.
But has anyone else noticed apart from me that Lucius Malfoy is in the memory where Voldemort is starting Hogwarts and he's already a prefect????
Wouldn't that make him like well over 60 now? and far too old to be Draco's dad, becuase he's described as young in the book, and the in the films he's like only 30/40ish. Any suggestions????
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
where says that Lucius was a prefect when Voldemort was in Hogwarts? I remember that Draco told in COS that her father wasn't in Hogwarts when the COS was opened but he knew all about that
Ivonne26 posted hampir setahun yang lalu
*
Lucius was in Snapes memory.
rtriplet posted hampir setahun yang lalu
*
Check the HP Lexicon : it is berkata that Lucius is interviewed in the newspaper in 1995 and he's 41 then. So he's born in 1954. So he's about 5 atau 6 years older than Severus only. sejak DH, he's in his mid-forties (Severus died at 38).
LadyNottingham posted hampir setahun yang lalu
beaulieu said:
Hagrids half giant so he probaly doesn't like us and voldemort perpecahan, berpecah he soul
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
hedgie13 said:
ya i always wondered about that.....

select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
Ivonne26 said:
well, I think that anda have to see that Hagrid is a half-giant so he could live lebih than a normal wizard and Voldemort was inmortal so maybe he was held in a minor age
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
rtriplet said:
The buku aren't set in this period. In was in the 19??
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
love_a_lot916 said:
that is because they can live longer than people god at least try to act smart!
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
runescape-lover said:
Thats because the Harry Potter buku are not set now, they are set when J.K Rowling was a kid.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
*
No they aren't. The book are set in the nineties. Philosopher's Stone is set in 1991.
Sappp posted hampir setahun yang lalu
kataraang45 said:
u r so right! voldemort*snooorttt* hahahahaha!
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
happyallie said:
since voldemort was "revived" he looked healthier then normal hagrid on the other hand is half-giant so that may have some kind of an effect
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
bambinabird said:
no they are not but it would take a lot of time to grow that big of a beard atau rip your soul into seven
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
potterhead4ever said:
Well for one thing, wizards live much longer than muggles, so they may not age in appearance as fast. Hagrid is also half-giant. That may have to do with why he looks younger than he is. As for Voldemort, like others have said, he may have stopped aging when he made his first horcrux.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
misukikoyama said:
if anda have seen the Filem hagrid is greying and is kind of wrinkly anda can't tell how old volde~ oops i mean the dark lord is cause he died and came back with horcruxes but anda can tell a little.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
TheLogicalwitch said:
Rowling didn't write in any of the buku about Hagrid atau Voldemort being younger than in their sixties.
Instead of finding flaws in JKR's incredible plots,think of some interesting questions.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
mahira1016 said:
i think voldemort didnt age because he drank unicorn blood and because hagrid is half a giant.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
HarryPotterBabe said:
Wizards live much longer, take Dumbledore for instance! So maybe Mid 60's isn't even really that old. But yeah, your right, they would be, 65, and 63, I believe(:
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
dragonsmemory said:
Wizards live much longer than their Muggle counterparts. At the time of the Chamber's saat opening, Dumbledore was 150 and McGonagall a sprightly 70. Thus, Hagrid is probably in the prime of his life.
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
7bella3 said:
Ive been wonderin that to!
and sometimes i think
'Huh? how does voldemort have the power to even walk?'
I guess we'll never know :(
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
Azniro said:
Wizards age differently to us "muggles" they can live to a great age so i guess that's why atau they just take care of them selfs
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
LunaNotLoony said:
Well, Voldemort did lose a lot of hair...
select as best answer
posted hampir setahun yang lalu 
next question »