What is it with all of the comparison typed content all over the internet between Twilight and Harry Potter?
Well I suppose they can be compared sejak their levels of success--but not really--harry potter is on another level.
And as a story, it's like comparing a coloring book to a good novel. Apples and oranges people.
In Harry Potter JK Rowling creates a whole other universe for readers to lose themselves in. Stephanie Meyer on the other hand has just slapped together a barely readable teenage fantasy.
RL. Stines Goosebumps buku are lebih engagnig that Twilight for Pete's sake.
I have watched one of the Twilight Filem and didn't find it enjoyable at all. What is so enjoyable about watching an ungrateful teenage protagonist that does little lebih than moan and complain? Nothing.
Well I suppose they can be compared sejak their levels of success--but not really--harry potter is on another level.
And as a story, it's like comparing a coloring book to a good novel. Apples and oranges people.
In Harry Potter JK Rowling creates a whole other universe for readers to lose themselves in. Stephanie Meyer on the other hand has just slapped together a barely readable teenage fantasy.
RL. Stines Goosebumps buku are lebih engagnig that Twilight for Pete's sake.
I have watched one of the Twilight Filem and didn't find it enjoyable at all. What is so enjoyable about watching an ungrateful teenage protagonist that does little lebih than moan and complain? Nothing.
I recently found a strange contradiction in the concept of wizarding money.I'd like to know if my idea is true atau if there is a counter-argument against it.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured sejak magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured sejak magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
