WARNING
-This artikel WILL contain spoilers, anda were warned!-



This is sort of like a review but not a main review if that makes sense.

Alpha and Omega - Dino Digs is a movie focused on Dinosaur with the wolves.
So after I watched most of it, like enough of it to get the main story, etc. I thought well... hmm..?

And after finishing it, I actually thought.. this was pretty original and creative. anda know, it would be very unfair to say it's a "bad" movie because it's original and new. Otherwise, who needs creativity?

I never seen an anthropomorphic serigala, wolf movie go this far before, the ideas together was lebih unique, and something that will be remembered.

Sadly, I'm already aware some people may call this a bad movie just because... it's different. atau lebih like because it has dinosaurs.
I honestly think putting effort is about... adding effort? It isn't fair to call a movie bad because they did something new and lebih original.
It's like calling a Pixar film bad because Remy could cook atau something..


However, for my attempt of trying to add effort, there is some issues with the films and some fan feedback to.

Problems and Other
In one part, (Thanks to a user pointing this out too?), Humphrey got stuck into a log, but somehow he could lift it like it's made of plastic. Despite their new utama WAS made of plastic, I do not think that object was.

In another part, the pups drive the car... well, that's not the problem, it's how they suddenly knew how to turn the key, and drive.
Remy in the tikus movie could cook, but if I could remember, I think they've shown Remy learning.
Yes the Serigala are anthropomorphic and I do not think everything needs an explanation, especially their sudden human like brain, but I think them driving a car without knowing what a car is (?) needed an explanation.

Humphrey berkata he's a four legged serigala, wolf atau so, then say "this isn't natural for me".
Why this? The part seems confusing because he has done standing up stuff all the time, even before this scene on the same movie..
Maybe someone else has a better explanation?

How did they find all that stuff to build that fake cave? One thing is understandable. She could of mencuri all the man-made stuff.

animasi in parts were pretty bad.

The lack of explanation for the dinosaur and how there is a sudden mysterious portal was a problem. I felt like they needed to be deeper.

Humphrey was too serious. I find it kinda sad to see the lack of humor from Humphrey.

No Lilly...
This is lebih peminat feedback:
Sadly judging sejak their website, they just don't seem to care about Lilly. Does the company ever listen to our feedback? Lilly may not be my favorite, but she is still very good (I even like her than Kate personally) but she deserves to come back. Even if the company ever did listen to my requests about Humphrey. LOL!

And more?

---

My kegemaran parts was how Humphrey just had this throwback spark from the first movie. He was able to grab people for safety, stand on hinds to play golf, and there was other parts I liked, how wild it got with Humphrey.
It may look odd to some, but the first movie was similar to that and I liked how they put lebih effort of animasi to some of the wolves.



Now then, I still think the sequel was still a usual lazy sequel with some.. lebih good stuff.. and the first still seems superior.
I'm curious what other people liked and what other flaws atau serious problems there were?
I am also open to what I missed!

EDIT: I've made some mistakes. I later realized the humans were the ones that made the cave, and there was some deeper explanations for the Dinosaur even though I am not sure if it's enough still.