So as I'm saying, Ron is one of those many characters that I preferred in the buku , but the difference in the movie and the book Ron- its superior. In fact, I can say I am neutral about the movie Ron a bit while liking the buku Ron.
So first of all, the Filem portrayed Ron's relationships very, very BAD. I think the director shipped Harry with Hermione, because their chemistry in the movie is such a blessing while Ron just appears from nowhere in the movies. Mostly like everyone, I started on the series sejak watching the Filem when I was a bit of younger, and I was soo confused when Ron and Hermione ended up together.
I mean, the person who always stays with Hermione in the Filem is Harry. She has all her happy moments with him, also constantly kisses, hugs him all over while only arguing with Ron. The Filem made Ron a huge jerk in the 4th movie, how rude he was when he tried to ask Hermione out to the Yule Ball. Shortly, Ron sucked at relationships in the movies. The Filem also made him look like he got Lavender from nowhere, BUT. Ron actually started dating Lavender because Hermione was out with Viktor so he tried to make her jealous. That's quite obvious for the book readers because the buku include Ron's feelings on Hermione and Krum. However, someone watching Harry Potter can easily think Ron is a bad boy playing around with girls. ( An assumption I made when I watched the Filem first)
In the books, Hermione and Ron have chemistry. I still ship Hermione with Harry though, but still Ramione makes sense. The book Ron is also always willing to be with Hermione, he doesn't go and play with Hermione's feelings like the movie Ron atau Ginny Weasley.
I don't know if this makes any sense to you, but the book Ron was also lebih loyal to Harry than the movie Ron. Oh, of course nobody can be lebih loyal than Hermione ( how she didn't leave him in his bad moments, just cute) And even though Ron sometimes felt bad being with Harry because he was a wealthy wizard, Ron's sadness was way lebih detailed and understandable in the books. Nothing makes up for how he left Harry in the middle when he went searching for the horcruxes, but he still was a good friend to Harry since the beginning.
The adventures are just a big no without him..
Thanks for reading, see you!
<3
So first of all, the Filem portrayed Ron's relationships very, very BAD. I think the director shipped Harry with Hermione, because their chemistry in the movie is such a blessing while Ron just appears from nowhere in the movies. Mostly like everyone, I started on the series sejak watching the Filem when I was a bit of younger, and I was soo confused when Ron and Hermione ended up together.
I mean, the person who always stays with Hermione in the Filem is Harry. She has all her happy moments with him, also constantly kisses, hugs him all over while only arguing with Ron. The Filem made Ron a huge jerk in the 4th movie, how rude he was when he tried to ask Hermione out to the Yule Ball. Shortly, Ron sucked at relationships in the movies. The Filem also made him look like he got Lavender from nowhere, BUT. Ron actually started dating Lavender because Hermione was out with Viktor so he tried to make her jealous. That's quite obvious for the book readers because the buku include Ron's feelings on Hermione and Krum. However, someone watching Harry Potter can easily think Ron is a bad boy playing around with girls. ( An assumption I made when I watched the Filem first)
In the books, Hermione and Ron have chemistry. I still ship Hermione with Harry though, but still Ramione makes sense. The book Ron is also always willing to be with Hermione, he doesn't go and play with Hermione's feelings like the movie Ron atau Ginny Weasley.
I don't know if this makes any sense to you, but the book Ron was also lebih loyal to Harry than the movie Ron. Oh, of course nobody can be lebih loyal than Hermione ( how she didn't leave him in his bad moments, just cute) And even though Ron sometimes felt bad being with Harry because he was a wealthy wizard, Ron's sadness was way lebih detailed and understandable in the books. Nothing makes up for how he left Harry in the middle when he went searching for the horcruxes, but he still was a good friend to Harry since the beginning.
The adventures are just a big no without him..
Thanks for reading, see you!
<3
All who Died in Harry Potter(Most of Them Anyway)
Cedric Diggory, Professor Quirrell
Dobby, The Basalisk
Bilius Weasley, Barty Crouch Sr.
Igor Karkaroff, Aragog
Tonks, Bloody Baron
Professor Lupin, Helena Ravenclaw
Mad Eye Moody, Helga Hufflepuff
Bellatrix, Godric Gryffindor
Voldemort, Salzar Slytherin
Fred Weasley, Regulus Black
James Potter, Rufus Scrimigeour
Lily Potter, Gregorovitch
Severus Snape, Grindlewald
Ollivander, Vincent Crabbe
Albus Dumbledore, Lavender Brown
Sirius Black, Colin Creevey
Peter Petigrew , Nagini
Octavius Pepper
Charity Burbage
Bathilda Bagshot
Hedwig
Cedric Diggory, Professor Quirrell
Dobby, The Basalisk
Bilius Weasley, Barty Crouch Sr.
Igor Karkaroff, Aragog
Tonks, Bloody Baron
Professor Lupin, Helena Ravenclaw
Mad Eye Moody, Helga Hufflepuff
Bellatrix, Godric Gryffindor
Voldemort, Salzar Slytherin
Fred Weasley, Regulus Black
James Potter, Rufus Scrimigeour
Lily Potter, Gregorovitch
Severus Snape, Grindlewald
Ollivander, Vincent Crabbe
Albus Dumbledore, Lavender Brown
Sirius Black, Colin Creevey
Peter Petigrew , Nagini
Octavius Pepper
Charity Burbage
Bathilda Bagshot
Hedwig
I was asked to do this sejak lorythefangirl after I responded to her earlier one.
Pros
1. Most of them did believe they were choosing the winning side at the time
2. They would likely be killed if they refused, atau otherwise punished.
3. If they come from old pureblood families which share the Death Eaters' beliefs, joining up would help maintain family harmony
4. If they're naturally malicious it gives them an opportunity to kill and torture
Cons
1. Most people wouldn't want to be forced to murder. They might be pushed beyond their own limits, e.g. Draco Malfoy.
2. They'd get imprisoned in Azkaban if caught, atau could be killed in self-defence
3. Leaving isn't an option once you're in
4. After they lost, those who'd survived would lose favour even if they avoided punishment
5. Voldemort doesn't seem to be a nice boss
6. It's a story really, and in most stories, the bad guys do end up losing and being punished.
Pros
1. Most of them did believe they were choosing the winning side at the time
2. They would likely be killed if they refused, atau otherwise punished.
3. If they come from old pureblood families which share the Death Eaters' beliefs, joining up would help maintain family harmony
4. If they're naturally malicious it gives them an opportunity to kill and torture
Cons
1. Most people wouldn't want to be forced to murder. They might be pushed beyond their own limits, e.g. Draco Malfoy.
2. They'd get imprisoned in Azkaban if caught, atau could be killed in self-defence
3. Leaving isn't an option once you're in
4. After they lost, those who'd survived would lose favour even if they avoided punishment
5. Voldemort doesn't seem to be a nice boss
6. It's a story really, and in most stories, the bad guys do end up losing and being punished.
Harry woke with a start as Teddy’s cries pierced the small room. He groggily climbed out of the warm katil and stumbled over to the buaian, bassinet sejak the window. In the moonlight he could see that Teddy’s hair was bright pink. Chuckling to himself, he lifted the baby out of the tempat tidur bayi, katil bayi and started over to the rocking chair.
He fed Teddy some warm milk.He stopped crying. Harry smiled,and Teddy smiled back.Harry put him back in the crib.Instantly Teddy fell asleep.
He fed Teddy some warm milk.He stopped crying. Harry smiled,and Teddy smiled back.Harry put him back in the crib.Instantly Teddy fell asleep.