hei Pokemon fans, I'm really angry at the ratings for Pokemon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire. The ESRB and PEGI ratings for Pokemon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire has been revealed. Why the ESRB and PEGI ratings has to be Everyone and 7? Yes, this is a rant. PEGI 7 version of E rated Pokemon games is the reason why E rated Pokemon main series games Lost PEGI 3 in Europe. In the end, PEGI 7 version of E rated Pokemon games killed E rated Pokemon games. Stupid PEGI 7 for ruining E rated Pokemon gamed. Now, I'll be talking about why E rated Pokemon games should not be rated PEGI 7. Take a look.

While I can have my opinion on newer Pokemon games, but what's the deal with ESRB ratings? The violence in the game is mild and cartoony enough for little kids, hence the E for EVERYONE rating. It could be about the 3D, but anda mentioned MK8. And the 3D is the reason any 3DS game in Eropah is rated at least PEGI 7. Even though there's a 2DS. But not all E rated games are rated 3. Sometimes if an E rated game is a little too violent for a 6 tahun old, then it's going to be rated 7. Example, Kirby Triple Deluxe is rated E and yet it was rated 7 in Europe. I hate PEGI 7 version of ESRB Everyone games. I'm sick of that method. 7 is NOT an equivalent to E. Mario games are rated E and 3 because Mario is for everybody. Also, PEGI 7 does not mean it has 3D, it's the rating that cause violence that may frighten children 6 sand under. That's why 3D is not suitable for children 6 and under, not 3D cause the rating to be 7. Therefore, 2DS is a better profit for a 6 tahun old if 6 tahun olds wanted to play E games in North America atau PEGI 3 in Europe.

Pokemon games still use Everyone. I hate Everyone. I can't stand Everyone. Now I have to destroy ESRB because Pokemon games still only have Everyone ratings. Why Pokemon games with another ESRB rating only have Pokemon Rumble and Pokemon Rumble Blast. Both Pokemon games are rated E10+. E10+ should be a perfect rating for Pokemon Omega Ruby and Pokemon Alpha Sapphire. But no, Pokemon Omega Ruby and Pokemon Alpha Sapphire are both rated E and I can't stand E ratings. Worse, why E rated games still use repeat content descriptors over and over again. Why can't ESRB rated games uses content descriptors from one main series game to another? For instance, Mario Kart 8's rating is E and the content descriptor is Comic Mischief. Why can't Mario Kart 8 uses Mild Cartoon Violence? Mild Cartoon Violence should be a perfect content distributor for Mario Kart 8, but ESRB blew it.

ESRB blew it for putting E on Pokemon Omega Ruby and Pokemon Alpha Sapphire. I hate E ratings. Why can't Pokemon games uses another ESRB rating like E10+? I know T and M rating hurt Pokemon games. But Pokemon games needs to alih to E10+ rating for the main series games. But no, ESRB puts E on Pokemon Omega Ruby and Pokemon Alpha Sapphire that should be rated E10+. ARGH! I hate America ratings goes sejak money. I want my America ratings go sejak America contents.

Then it got worse, why E rated Pokemon games has to be rated PEGI 7? I hate PEGI 7 version of E rated Pokemon games. It's getting annoying. ESRB's and PEGI's policy is different, so, naturally, the ratings will be different. PEGI 7 isn't the equivalent of E atau T, PEGI 7 is actually the equivalent of E10+ whereas PEGI 3 is the equivalent of E/EC. But it just means that it's a slightly lebih for older kids than the PEGI 3. Plus, 6 tahun olds are not older kids. 6 tahun olds are younger children. Both of them are Everyone, with slight differences. Yes, the policy is different for both companies. In some cases, PEGI is lebih severe than ESRB, in other cases, it's the opposite. I mean PEGI 7 is the equivalent of E10+. PEGI 3 is the equivalent of EC/E an yet certain E games like this one is rated PEGI 7. E is appropriate for 6 tahun olds, PEGI 7 doesn't. Now let's continue my rant. Shall we?

I'm not happy at ESRB rates Everyone on Pokemon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire. Why ESRB still use recycled content descriptors version of E rated games? Couldn't ESRB rated games uses different content descriptors from on game in the same series to another? Why can't American ratings uses contents, not money? If ESRB rated Pokemon Omega Ruby and Alpha Sapphire E10+, then the ratings will be perfect for the games. I guess America's marketing department doesn't care about perfects and they only want repeats and money. I hate money version of American release. Bring back America releases goes sejak evolutions/qualities. It seems that Pokemon did an awful job taking breaks and why Pokemon Omega Ruby and Pokemon Alpha Sapphire were rated E. Let's alih on.

People can barely understand the way I wrote but people think that people got most of it and much seems pointless and as for ESRB rating what is my problem with it in the first place? Why an E rating is very appropriate seriously when was the last time someone got so much as splinter in a Pokemon MS RPG? An E10+ is actually no different from an E rating and the ESRB ratings are only enforced past a M rating nothing is stopping a nine tahun old from getting an E10+ atau even a T rating. E10+ should be a perfect rating for Pokemon's main series RPGs on the 3DS, but ESRB blew it. What is ESRB thinking?

I hate E ratings. I'm sick of that ESRB rating. Nintendo needs to pay attention to other ESRB ratings like T. I'm sick of E ratings. Also, Everyone is for ages 6 and up, not for everybody. 3 is the only PEGI rating that is for everybody.

In my opinion, Pokemon needs to alih its main series games to E10+ in North America and yet Pokemon still use E on its main series releases. It's getting annoying. I hate E. I'm sick of that rating. Why Pokemon doesn't use E10+ on the main series outputs? Pokemon would be a perfect time to alih its main series games to E10+, but ESRB blew it. Mega Evolutions does not make the games rated E. Mega Evolutions is a little strict to make the games E rated and yet the game are rated E. Worse, the game are rated E and yet the Eropah one are rated PEGI 7. Why the ratings has to be E and 7? I hate PEGI 7 version of E rated games. PEGI 7 ruined E rated games. E10+ rated games are fine to be rated PEGI 7. But an E rated game was rated 7 does not work together. E and 7 should not work together. I mean, why an E rated game has to be rated 7? 3 is a much better rating for most E games because most E game like Mario are rated 3. Yet, E games still use 7 ratings in Europe. What is rating systems thinking. I know ESRB and PEGI are different ratings systems. PEGI 7 version of E rated games prevents a 6 tahun old to play a PEGI 7 game that is rated E making 6 tahun olds stuck with E rated games that are rated 7. E is fine for 6 tahun olds but 7 is not a PEGI rating for 6 tahun olds. That why ratings systems hates young children like 6 tahun olds. Young children ratings mostly appeal preschool outputs including 6 tahun olds. It's not because I'm a brat, it's because of the marketing for the ratings department.

Also, stop using. kids doesn't know Pokemon nowadays despite kids is Pokemon target audiences. The only kids who know Pokemon is Japan. That's why Pokemon is not a kids franchise. It's for everybody including adults. I guess I have to wait for GameFreak making an E10+ Pokemon game as the seterusnya Pokemon game. Then it got lazy, Pokemon has brought us Mega Evolutions and yet it's rated E. Mega Evolutions does not make the game be rated E. I mean, Mega Evolutions was too strict to make the Pokemon games rated E. If the Pokemon game were rated E10, then Mega Evolutions will make the contents looked lebih complex. Look at Europe, the E rated Pokemon games were rated 7 because of Mega Evolutions and violence that can make the game too strict and frightens children 6 and under. That's why 3 is not a good rating for the 6th generation Pokemon games. So it has to be rated 7. If Pokemon moves the versions canon games to E10, then Mega Evolutions will make the Pokemon games rated E10.

Bottom line, never rated E rated Pokemon games, PEGI 7. EVER AGAIN!