Isabella Swan: Loyal and smart?!

*Facepalm* I would like to know where the Twihards are pulling this out of their asses. They must be digging deep.

But this is pretty much what I've been mulling over lately. All of Stephenie Meyer's characters have certain titles about them, but that's all it is. Titles. We almost never see examples that have earned them berkata titles. For example...

Isabella Swan:
* "Loyalty." I will admit, for the most part she is 'loyal,' in a way. But she is only loyal in the way that she is completely obsessed with her controlling, emotionally and mentally abusive 'vampire' boyfriend. And she's only obsessed with him because he's supposedly drop dead (excuse the pun =]) gorgeous and 'oh so perfect.' It really is obsession; it could not be called loyalty because it's too shallow. And as another said, she used Jacob as a substitute for Edward and when her Eddiekins returned, dropped him and threw him in the trash like he was nothing. It shows that she's fickle and she just wants a man to make her feel special and way better than everyone else. She doesn't really seem to actually give a damn about them, she seems to have a superiority complex with everyone except Edward and the Cullens, and stays Edward's unthinking, dependent bitch.
* "Intelligent." Um, what? I never seen ANY example of this in the books, none of them. Actually, she seems kind of mentally retarded to me with the choices she makes (that may seem why I have that picture on my answer, but that's actually my depiction of the idiotic Twilight peminat-peminat :D Notice I didn't say all). Such as...oh, picking to chase after a bloodthirsty undead being who especially lusted after her blood in particular? A dude who fought himself tooth and nail just to prevent himself from sucking her dry and killing her? Putting herself purposefully in danger when berkata undead guy dumps her keldai just to hear his voice? Just some examples, if anda want lebih sejak all means ask me. But that's the thing, I see no examples of her being intelligent, only stupid. :)
* "Great persona." Again, never seen anything that helped prove this suggestion, only the OPPOSITE of this. Again may I mention Bella's possible superiority complex with everyone other than Edward and the Cullens. She treats the other Cullens with some sort of kissass-y 'respect' (if anda could even call it that), but they matter just as much as her human familiars do to her. The only person that matters (not to her, but just matters) is her Eddiekins. That's it. She sees her human familiars as incredibly petty and not worth her time. Plus she's stupid. Plus she wouldn't know true Cinta if it bit her in the ass. Plus...argh, so many other reasons. But I'll end here. But just saying:
Bella angsa, swan is NOT loyal, NOT intelligent and SURE AS HELL NOT a great persona. Have a good day. :)

They berkata WHAT about Bella? =| Obviously, she's not intelligent. Intelligent people don't Ciuman people who want to eat them. And SURE, anda say she's loyal! I would agree if loyalty meant obsession. -_- Her so called 'loyalty' is just, I'm sorry, CREEPY!
And if people believe that Bella is a great role model, then I'm scared about the future of our generation. =|

I think this is utterly wrong to consider balla as a role model i mean whats that good in her personality to be a role model i would say these girls dont even knw the meaning of what a role model is they need to check the dictionary for it and look up what it means the they should answer this soalan i think twilight has alienated the minds of the younger generations i know that i myself at first was really inspired sejak it but then i came to my senses and now i know that that was stupid of me.And i dont get the part where they say bella is intelligent i mean she keeps herself in danger of seeing someones face atau voice i mean i would never keep myself in danger i Cinta myself too much to attempt something ridiculouse to ruin my beauty lolzz.Anyway the other thing thses girls need to understand is that twilight is a story book not reality,whatever happens in buku doesnt happen in real life anda will never be able to find somebody like edward atau jacob atau your prince charming i think sejak twilight people specially girls are going back to that time of thier life when they would read Cinderella and hope someday thier prince will come and then they grow up and now there is no such thing as prince charming i say the same rule applies here too there is no edward atau bella in real life theses are all fictional characters made sejak an idiot named SM

Hope my answer is satisfactory.

i don't know WHAT to say!!! :P

A good role model for young girls?!
Bella is just a selfish girl, who only demonstrated this: all anda need in life is a gorgeous husband! What do friends, family and being an independent woman with a career matter if anda have this?! I mean please. She is in NO WAY a good role model, even Kristen Stewart has berkata it herself

*facepalm* And they need to interview us on why he HATE Twilight...

i want to know why they think she is a role model. vamps dont exist so what does she do that would be good for other girls to do??? i am a twilight peminat but this is just .... well.... not normal.

ummm no... lebih like selfish and dependent

Hey, talking to another boy doesn't tunjuk disloyalty. Especially when the guy you're loyal to appears to be gone forever.
Ciuman another boy can sometimes tunjuk disloyalty, but not when that boy threatens to kill himself if anda don't Ciuman him.


Being erratic and irrational doesn't tunjuk lack of intellect. Emotional responses take place in the limbic system. Knowledge isn't stored in the limbic system. They two are really unrelated.